header-left
File #: 0259-2004    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 1/28/2004 In control: Safety Committee
On agenda: 3/8/2004 Final action: 3/9/2004
Title: To authorize and direct the City Attorney to pay the settlement amount to James McNamara, counsel for Plaintiff Robert Woda, in the case of Robert Woda v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court Case No. C2-99-479, to authorize the expenditure of the sum of One Thousand Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($175,000.00), and to declare an emergency.
Explanation
Background: This Ordinance authorizes the payment of a settlement in the lawsuit of Robert Woda v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court Case No. C2-99-479. During the evening of May 30, 1998, Officer Samuel Sias observed what he believed to be an altercation between Robert Woda and several other people. Woda had a pistol and, as Officer Sias exited his cruiser, Robert Woda began to run. Woda refused or ignored the warnings of Officer Sias to stop. In the entrance to 341 Clarendon Avenue, Officer Sias took Robert Woda to the floor and confiscated the gun and a knife which was concealed in Robert Woda's ankle area. Officer Sias, with assistance from Officer Charles Hill, attempted to control Woda. Woda alleged that the officers used excessive force, which is denied by the officers.

Fiscal Impact: Funds were not specifically budgeted for this settlement; however sufficient monies are available in the appropriate account to pay the amount this claim.

Title

To authorize and direct the City Attorney to pay the settlement amount to James McNamara, counsel for Plaintiff Robert Woda, in the case of Robert Woda v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court Case No. C2-99-479, to authorize the expenditure of the sum of One Thousand Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($175,000.00), and to declare an emergency.

Body
WHEREAS, a trial was held in the United States District Court in April, 2002, and a decision was rendered by the Court in July, 2003, with the Court finding against the two officers in the amount of $50,000.00, plus plaintiff was entitled to payment of attorney's fees;

WHEREAS, the finding was appealed on behalf of the defendant officers and a cross appeal was filed by the plaintiff;

WHEREAS, while the appeals were pending the parties entered settlement discussions;

WHEREAS, due to the facts and dispute of these claims and the risks and uncertainties associated with the continued litigation, t...

Click here for full text