header-left
File #: 0619-2013    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 3/4/2013 In control: Public Utilities Committee
On agenda: 4/22/2013 Final action: 4/24/2013
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to modify the professional engineering services agreement with Burgess and Niple, Inc. for the Bethel Road Booster Station Improvements Project; for the Division of Water; to authorize a transfer and expenditure up to $376,424.00 within the Water Works Enlargement Voted Bonds Fund; and to amend the 2013 Capital Improvements Budget. ($376,424.00)
Attachments: 1. ORD 0619-2013 Information, 2. ORD 0619-2013 Sub ID, 3. ORD 0619-2013 Map
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This Ordinance authorizes the Director of Public Utilities to modify and increase the professional engineering services agreement with Burgess and Niple, Inc. for the Bethel Road Booster Station Improvements Project, for the Division of Water Contract No. 1122.

This project consists of two phases. Phase One was legislated under original agreement, EL009190 (Ordinance No. 2012-2008), and consisted of studying two booster stations, Bethel and Henderson; evaluating alternatives that would best utilize the stations; and improving system efficiencies. Phase One generated recommendations that were evaluated during the Business Case Evaluation (BCE) process.

Modification Number One (current) is for Phase Two which includes the implementation of those recommendations. The consultant will be responsible for the design and plan preparation, bidding, review of construction submittals during construction, and preparation of record plans.

1.1 Amount of additional funds to be expended: $376,424.00
Original Agreement Amount: $100,804.00 (EL009190)
Modification 1 (current) $376,424.00
Modification 2 (future) $ 50,000.00
Total (Orig. + Mods.1-2) $527,228.00

1.2. Reasons additional goods/services could not be foreseen:
Ordinance No. 2012-2008 stated this project consisted of two phases and that a modification to the contract will be required for Phase Two once the scope was determined in Phase One.

1.3. Reason other procurement processes are not used:
Burgess & Niple, Inc. is familiar with the details of the project. This contract was anticipated to be funded in two phases as indicated on the original authorizing legislation (Ordinance No. 2012-2008). The process of selecting and contracting with a new consultant team at this time and having them start with data and reports prepared by another consultant would further delay the project.

1.4. How cost of modification was determined:
A cost estimate, including labor hours, was provide...

Click here for full text