header-left
File #: 1139-2005    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 6/14/2005 In control: Safety Committee
On agenda: 6/27/2005 Final action: 6/30/2005
Title: To authorize and direct the City Attorney to pay the settlement amount to Brian Joslyn and Jim McNamara, counsel for Mr. Joslyn, in the case of Brian Joslyn v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court Case No. C2-03-231, to authorize the expenditure of the sum of Seventy-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars; and to declare an emergency. ($75,000.00).
Explanation

This Ordinance is submitted to settle the lawsuit known as Brian Joslyn v. City of Columbus, et al., Case No. C2-03-231 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, in the amount of Seventy-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($75,000.00). On April 21, 2002, the plaintiff suffered injuries to his head and hand while he was being arrested in the vicinity of Chittenden Avenue, just east of the Ohio State University campus. Columbus police officers were in the process of responding to a disturbance and defendant Officer Mays apprehended the plaintiff after seeing him throw a bottle in the direction of police officers. The plaintiff was subsequently acquitted of the charges that were brought against him.

Fiscal Impact: Funds were not specifically budgeted for this settlement; however sufficient monies are available in the appropriate account to pay the amount this claim.



Title

To authorize and direct the City Attorney to pay the settlement amount to Brian Joslyn and Jim McNamara, counsel for Mr. Joslyn, in the case of Brian Joslyn v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court Case No. C2-03-231, to authorize the expenditure of the sum of Seventy-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars; and to declare an emergency. ($75,000.00).



Body

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2003, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Case No. C2-03-231, against the City of Columbus and Officer Richard Mays in which he claimed a violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment. The City was subsequently dismissed from the lawsuit;

WHEREAS, Following the evaluation of plaintiff's claims in the course of litigation, the parties reached an agreement to settle this matter. Due to the dispute of this claim and the risks and uncertainties associated with continued litigation and trial, the settlement amount was deemed acceptable by the City ...

Click here for full text