Skip to main content
header-left
File #: 2611-2025    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 9/24/2025 In control: Finance & Governance Committee
On agenda: 10/27/2025 Final action: 10/29/2025
Title: To authorize the Director of Finance and Management, on behalf of the Office of Construction Management, to modify and increase the professional architectural / engineering services agreement with Karpinski Engineering, Inc.; for the Department of Technology’s City Hall Structured Cabling Assessment & Design project; to authorize a transfer of $225,000.00 between the General Fund Income Tax Set Aside Subfund and the Information Services Capital Projects Fund; to authorize an appropriation of $225,000.00 in the Income Tax Set Aside Subfund and the Information Services Capital Projects Fund; and to authorize an expenditure up to $225,000.00 from the Information Services Capital Projects Fund. ($225,000.00)
Attachments: 1. ORD 2610-2025 Funding
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This legislation authorizes the Director of Finance and Management to modify and increase the professional architectural / engineering services agreement, on behalf of the Office of Construction Management, with Karpinski Engineering, Inc., for the Department of Technology’s City Hall Structured Cabling Assessment & Design project, in the amount of $225,000.00.

This is a 2-Phased project. Work under the Phase 1 included a comprehension assessment to upgrade/replace the aging structural wiring and cabling throughout the City Hall.

Modification No. 1 (current) for Phase 2 will provide design-based services based on the results of Phase 1.

2. MODIFICATION INFO:

A. The amount of additional funds to be expended under the modification: $225,000.00

Original Contract Amount: $ 80,381.00 (PO465203)
Modification No. 1 (current): $225,000.00
Total (Original and Mod 1): $305,381.00

B. Why the need for additional goods or services could not be foreseen at the time the contract was initially awarded.
The need for Phase 2, design services, was foreseen at the time the contract was awarded with language included in Ordinance No. 1684-2024.

C. Why it would not be in the city’s best interests to have the additional contract requirements awarded through other procurement processes?
The current contractor is familiar with the project and has completed all work to-date. Bringing on a new contractor would further delay the project and result in higher costs bringing them up to speed.

D. How the price for the additional goods or services which are subject of the modification was determined.
The contractor submitted a cost proposal and was accepted by the Office of Construction Management.

3. CONTRACT COMPLIANCE INFO: DAX No. 6639, expires 5/7/26, Majority-designated

Searches in the Excluded Party List System (Federal) and the Findings for Recovery list (State) produced no findings against Karpinski Engineering, Inc.

4. FISCAL IMPAC...

Click here for full text