header-left
File #: 0587-2010    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 4/6/2010 In control: Public Service & Transportation Committee
On agenda: 5/3/2010 Final action: 5/6/2010
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Service to execute a professional engineering services contract modification with Glaus, Pyle, Schomer, Burns and Dehaven (GPD) in connection with the General Engineering Bridges 2008 project for the Division of Planning and Operations; to authorize the expenditure of $200,000.00 from the Streets and Highways G.O. Bonds Fund; to amend the 2010 Capital Improvements Budget; to authorize the transfer of cash and appropriation within the Streets and Highways G.O. Bonds Fund; and to declare an emergency. ($200,000.00)
Attachments: 1. 0587-2010 Utilization Information.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting Details
5/6/20101 CITY CLERK Attest  Action details Meeting details
5/5/20101 MAYOR Signed  Action details Meeting details
5/3/20101 Columbus City Council ApprovedPass Action details Meeting details
5/3/20101 COUNCIL PRESIDENT Signed  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 Auditor Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 CITY AUDITOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 CITY ATTORNEY Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/15/20101 Service Drafter Sent to Clerk's Office for Council  Action details Meeting details
4/13/20101 FINANCE DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/12/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/12/20101 Finance Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/12/20101 Finance Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/9/20101 ODI DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/8/20101 Service Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/8/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/8/20101 SERVICE DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
4/8/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/8/20101 EBOCO Reviewer Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
4/6/20101 Service Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
Explanation
1. BACKGROUND
This legislation authorizes the Director of Public Service to modify and increase the professional engineering services contract for the General Engineering Bridges 2008 project with Glaus, Pyle, Schomer, Burns and Dehaven (GPD), in the amount of $200,000.00.

Work to date includes:
Bridge Inspections, bridge load ratings, bridge rehab workplans, and engineering reports. The majority of work in the next phase includes preparation of design plans; however, bridge inspections, engineering analysis and reports may be included in the future for currently unidentified bridges. This work is a logical extension of existing contract in that this modification will include preparation of engineering plans and specifications to correct bridge deficiencies identified in the workplans.

This modification is needed to assure timely completion of the project design and the Division of Planning and Operations does not maintain adequate staff or all of the various disciplines necessary to complete such design in house.

It was anticipated that plans would be needed to implement corrective measures to address bridge deficiencies; however, the magnitude of the work was not known going into the contract. It was identified that it was desirable to have the consultant perform inspections to identify deficiencies with the most problematic bridges and prepare workplans to define the scope and nature of work to be performed. That effort expended much of the available contract.
Since the consultant has performed detailed inspections and workplans they are very familiar with the bridges for which plans are desired. In order to have the plans and specifications developed to advertise the construction project this year, there is not sufficient time to request proposals for the project and execute an agreement. It is cost and time efficient to have the consultant continue with the plans for those bridges.
The original contract was $300,00...

Click here for full text