header-left
File #: 1599-2006    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 9/8/2006 In control: Utilities Committee
On agenda: 10/16/2006 Final action: 10/18/2006
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Burgess & Niple, Inc. for the Hap Cremean Water Plant Disinfection By-Products and Treatment Improvements Master Plan, for the Division of Power and Water, to authorize the expenditure of $3,490,000.00 from the Waterworks Enlargement Voted 1991 Bonds Fund, to amend the 2006 C.I.B., and to authorize the City Auditor to transfer funds within the Waterworks Enlargement Voted 1991 Bonds Fund. ($3,490,000.00)
Attachments: 1. HCWP_VicMap.pdf, 2. RFSQ Summary of submittals.pdf, 3. MBE-FBE Participation for RFSQ for HCWP DBR.pdf, 4. HCWP Scope of Services Final Draft.pdf, 5. HCWP_Schedule.pdf, 6. Final Cost Summary Rev2.pdf, 7. Information to be included in Contracting Legislation HCWP DBP ENG.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting Details
10/18/20061 MAYOR Signed  Action details Meeting details
10/18/20061 ACTING CITY CLERK Attest  Action details Meeting details
10/16/20061 Columbus City Council ApprovedPass Action details Meeting details
10/16/20061 COUNCIL PRESIDENT Signed  Action details Meeting details
10/2/20061 Columbus City Council Read for the First Time  Action details Meeting details
9/21/20061 CITY ATTORNEY Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/21/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent to Clerk's Office for Council  Action details Meeting details
9/20/20061 ODI DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/20/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/18/20061 EBOCO Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/13/20061 Auditor Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/13/20061 CITY AUDITOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/13/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/12/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/12/20061 Finance Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/12/20061 Finance - Purchasing Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/12/20061 FINANCE DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/12/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/11/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/11/20061 Utilities Reviewer Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/11/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/11/20061 Utilities Reviewer Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
9/11/20061 UTILITIES DIRECTOR Reviewed and Approved  Action details Meeting details
9/8/20061 Utilities Drafter Sent for Approval  Action details Meeting details
Explanation
The treatment processes at the HCWP are subject to the State 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR). The DBPR is part of the final phase of the Stage 2 Microbial and Disinfection Byproducts Rules as affirmed by Congress in the 1996 Drinking Water Act Amendments. This project shall provide engineering services necessary for and incident to addressing the issues of the DBPR as affecting the HCWP and take into consideration how any proposed treatment processes will be affected by other existing and proposed EPA regulatory rules. The selected professional consulting/egineering firm will provide full-service assistance to the City for the development of a production study to evaluate changes required to the treatment processes at Hap Cremean Water Plant (HCWP) to control disinfection by-products and make treatment improvements for compliance with existing and future regulatory requirements. The selected professional service firm will prepare technical reports of evaluation findings and make recommendations for improvements and/or alterations to the physical facilities and treatment processes.

A total of six (6) statements were received October 20, 2005 in response to the advertised Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFQ). None of the responses were from MBE/FBE firms; five of the six submitting firms had MBE/FBE firms as part of their project team. A five (5) member evaluation committee, in accordance with Section 329.13, evaluated the proposals and ranked the offerors based upon the evaluation criteria specified in the RFQ: qualifications of staff, professional qualifications, past performance, meeting schedules and budgets, and location of staff. Three (3) firms were selected to submit complete technical proposals, and to make presentations. Burgess & Niple, Inc. was selected based upon the quality and feasibility of their proposal and their competency to perform based on their assigned personnel. Burgess & Niple, Inc....

Click here for full text