header-left
File #: 1235-2020    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 5/18/2020 In control: Public Utilities Committee
On agenda: 6/29/2020 Final action: 7/2/2020
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to renew an existing engineering agreement with Strand Associates, Inc. for the Blueprint Fifth by Northwest Edgehill/Meadow project; to authorize the appropriation and transfer of up to $429,523.55; to authorize the expenditure of up to $972,134.55 from the Sanitary Sewer General Obligation Bond Fund; and to amend the 2019 Capital Improvement Budget. ($972,134.55)
Attachments: 1. ORD 1235-2020 Funding Template, 2. ORD 1235-2020 Utilization Form
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This project is being completed as part of the City’s Blueprint Columbus program. This project will design various types of green infrastructure (GI) for construction throughout the neighborhood which will provide a higher water quality within the region by treating the surface runoff before it discharges to the waterways. The project will also rehabilitate the existing sanitary sewer laterals and install or redirect new roof downspouts so as to reduce inflow and infiltration (I&I) within the sanitary sewer system which will result in fewer water in basements (WIBs), reduced sanitary sewer flows and decreased sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). This contract renewal will provide the funding necessary to conduct additional public meetings and outreach, complete the designs of the GI and private property work as well as the assembly of the bid documents for each of the phases.

1.1 Amount of additional funds to be expended: $ 972,134.55
Original Contract $ 733,591.91
Renewal #1(current) $ 972,134.55
Renewal # 2 (future) $ 225,100.00
CONTRACT TOTAL $1,930,826.46

1.2. Reasons additional goods/services could not be foreseen:
This is a planned contract modification/renewal and the additional services were identified in the original contract ordinance.

1.3. Reason other procurement processes are not used:
Re-bid of the project will likely result in a higher project costs as much of the project history would be lost and would need to be rediscovered by another consultant unless the new RFP were won by the same consultant. In such a case, we would have missed significant time in acquiring and evaluating the new proposals without significant benefit.

1.4. How cost of modification was determined:
A cost estimate for the proposed scope of work was prepared by Strand Associates, Inc.and reviewed by DOSD.

2. PROJECT TIMELINE: It is anticipated that this renewal will be for a term of 2 years.

3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION: An emerg...

Click here for full text