header-left
File #: 0129X-2023    Version: 1
Type: Ceremonial Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 7/6/2023 In control: Remy
On agenda: 7/10/2023 Final action: 7/13/2023
Title: To strongly oppose Issue 1 which, if passed at the August 8, 2023 special election, would require a 60% supermajority of Ohio voters to amend the state constitution and urge voters to vote NO.
Sponsors: Emmanuel V. Remy, Nicholas Bankston, Lourdes Barroso De Padilla, Mitchell Brown, Rob Dorans, Shayla Favor, Shannon G. Hardin
Title
To strongly oppose Issue 1 which, if passed at the August 8, 2023 special election, would require a 60% supermajority of Ohio voters to amend the state constitution and urge voters to vote NO.

Body
WHEREAS, since 1912, Ohio law has required a simple majority of 50% plus one vote to approve an amendment to the Ohio constitution; and

WHEREAS, this past May, Ohio lawmakers passed a joint resolution, by only a simple majority, to place a measure, now called Issue 1, on a special election ballot in August, making it more difficult to amend the Ohio constitution because Issue 1 would increase the approval threshold for state constitutional amendments from a simple majority of 50% plus one to a 60% supermajority; and

WHEREAS, just last year, Ohio lawmakers passed HB 458 eliminating August special elections; now, however, lawmakers want to allow the upcoming August special election, hoping that minimal voter turnout will pass the 60% supermajority requirement; and

WHEREAS, if passed in August, the new 60% supermajority requirement would go into effect before the November election, which lawmakers hope will hinder the potential passage of an expected ballot initiative to amend the Ohio constitution to protect reproductive rights and many other citizen-led initiatives that effect Ohioans’ daily lives; and

WHEREAS, Issue 1 would undermine the sacred principle of one person one vote; and

WHEREAS, Ohioans have not abused the right to place constitutional amendments on the ballot, with just 71 citizen-initiated amendments on the ballot since 1913; and

WHEREAS, the process to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot is already an onerous task, requiring the collection of hundreds of thousands of valid signatures from at least 44 of Ohio’s 88 counties; and

WHEREAS, by including the need to collect a certain threshold of signatures from all 88 counties almost guarantee that only extremely wealthy out of state interests will be able to afford to try to amend o...

Click here for full text