header-left
File #: 1938-2017    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 7/10/2017 In control: Public Utilities Committee
On agenda: 7/31/2017 Final action: 8/3/2017
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to modify and increase (Mod #1) an existing engineering agreement with Resource International for the Blueprint Clintonville Professional Construction Management (PCM) project; to authorize the appropriation and transfer of $652,318.95 from the Sanitary Sewer Reserve Fund to the Sanitary Sewer General Obligation (G.O.) Bond Fund and to authorize the expenditure of up to $652,318.95 from the G.O. Bond Fund. ($652,318.95)
Attachments: 1. Ord 1938-2017 Schedule 2A-1 SWIF 650870-100100 Mod #1, 2. Ord 1938-2016 Blueprint Clintonville Overview Map_6-20-17, 3. Ord 1938-2017 Director's Legislation Info Sheet - Contract Mod #1 (870.100)_6-20-17 (2), 4. Ord 1938-2017 DAX Financials PCM Project Mod 1
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This legislation authorizes the Director of the Department of Public Utilities to modify (Mod #1) an engineering agreement with Resource International for the Blueprint Clintonville Professional Construction Management (PCM), CIP 650870-100100. This agreement will provide construction management services for the installation of green infrastructure in the Clintonville pilot area of the City's Blueprint Columbus initiative. Planned future contract modifications will occur to perform similar services for the private property portion of Blueprint Columbus which consists of sewer service lateral lining.

This work will occur within the Clintonville planning area and the project boundary is identified approximately by Morse Road and Glencoe Road at its northern and southern limits and by Indianola Avenue and High Street at its eastern and western limits.

1.1 Amount of additional funds to be expended: $652,318.95
Original Contract (EL014392) $503,814.05
Current Mod #1 $652,318.95
Current Project Cost: $1,156,133.00

Future Modification $847,681.05
Future Total Cost ($) $2,003,814.00

1.2 Reasons additional goods/services could not be foreseen:
This modification was planned at contract origination.
1.3 Reasons other procurement processes are not used:
Re-bid of the project under will likely result in a higher project costs as much of the project history would be lost and required to be rediscovered by another consultant unless won by the same consultant. In such a case, we would have wasted significant time in acquiring and evaluating the new proposals without significant benefit.

1.4 How cost of modification was...

Click here for full text