header-left
File #: 3002-2017    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 11/4/2017 In control: Public Utilities Committee
On agenda: 12/11/2017 Final action: 12/14/2017
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to modify and increase a professional engineering services agreement with American Structurepoint, Inc. for the Center Large Diameter Condition Assessment Project; to authorize the transfer within of $126,882.97 and the expenditure of $526,882.97 from the Sanitary Sewer General Obligation Bond Fund; and to amend the 2017 Capital Improvements Budget. ($526,882.97)
Attachments: 1. Ord 3002-2017 SWIF 650725-9 Ctr Dia Condition Assessment, 2. Ord 3002-2017 DAX Financial Form
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This legislation authorizes the Director of Public Utilities to modify (Mod #1) and increase an existing engineering agreement with American Structurepoint, Inc. for the Center Large Diameter Condition Assessment Project, CIP 650725-100009. The purpose of the Center Large Diameter Condition Assessment is to perform a sewer condition assessment of all combined sewers larger than 36” in the downtown area as well as sanitary sewers 36” and larger that have not been previously televised to determine the debris accumulation and structure integrity of the pipes. The scope of work for this modification will include the subsequent investigations required in order to obtain additional data for the project plans, the completion of the construction drawings, bidding of the work, engineering services during construction, and completion of record plan drawings once construction is completed.

1.1 Amount of additional funds to be expended: $526,882.97

Original Contract $1,002,541.80
Proposed Modification No.1 (current) $ 526,882.97
CURRENT PROPOSED TOTAL $1,529,424.77

1.2. Reasons additional goods/services could not be foreseen:
This is a planned contract modification.

1.3. Reason other procurement processes are not used:
Re-bid of the project under the new requirements will likely result in a higher project costs as much of the project history would be lost and required to be rediscovered by another consultant unless won by the same consultant. In such a case, we would have wasted significant time in acquiring and evaluating the new proposals without significant benefit.

1.4. How cost of modification was determined:
The costs were determined through negotiations with the consultant based on the scope of services required.

2. THE PROJECT TIMELINE: It is anticipated that it will take 12 months to complete the project plans and advertise the project for construction.

3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION: An emergency ...

Click here for full text