header-left
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 1879-2018    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 6/26/2018 In control: Public Utilities Committee
On agenda: 7/23/2018 Final action: 7/25/2018
Title: To authorize the Director of Public Utilities to renew (Renewal #1) an existing engineering agreement with Resource International for the Blueprint Clintonville Professional Construction Management (PCM) project; to authorize the transfer within of $402,319.34; the expenditure of up to $750,000.34 from the Sanitary Sewer General Obligation (G.O.) Bond Fund; and to amend the 2018 Capital Improvements Budget. ($750,000.34)
Attachments: 1. Ord 1879-2018 Director's Legislation Information Sheet (6-18-2018), 2. Ord 1879-2018 SCH 2A-1 NEW Subcontractor Work Identification Form (870.100) (6-18-18), 3. Ord 1879-2018 DAX Financial BP Clintonville PCM Renew#1
Explanation

1. BACKGROUND: This legislation authorizes the Director of the Department of Public Utilities to renew (Renewal #1) an engineering agreement with Resource International for the Blueprint Clintonville Professional Construction Management (PCM) agreement, CIP 650870-100100. This agreement will provide construction management services for the installation of green infrastructure in the Clintonville pilot area of the City's Blueprint Columbus initiative. Planned future contract modifications will occur to perform similar services for the private property portion of Blueprint Columbus which consists of sewer service lateral lining.

This work will occur within the Clintonville planning area and the project boundary is identified approximately by Morse Road and Glencoe Road at its northern and southern limits and by Indianola Avenue and High Street at its eastern and western limits.

RENEWAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Amount of additional funds to be expended: $750,000.34
Original Contract $ 503,814.05
Modification #1 $ 652,318.95
Renewal #1 (Current): $ 750,000.34

Future Renewal $ 750,000.00
Future Total Cost ($) $2,656,133.34

1.2 Reasons additional goods/services could not be foreseen:
This was planned at contract origination.
1.3 Reasons other procurement processes are not used:
Re-bid of the project under will likely result in a higher project costs as much of the project history would be lost and required to be rediscovered by another consultant unless won by the same consultant. In such a case, we would have wasted significant time in acquiring and evaluating the new proposals without significant benefit.

1.4 How cost of modification was determined:
The cost...

Click here for full text